لعلاقة بين الاستقامة التنظيمية والسلوک الاستباقى: الدور الوسيط للتماثل التنظيمي. (دراسة ميدانية) The Relationship between Organizational Virtuousness and Proactive Behavior : Organizational Identification as a Mediator (An Empirical Study)

أولاً- المراجع العربية:

• العطوى, عامر على, والحسينى کمال کاظم.(2018). دور ثقافة إدارة الخطأ في تعزيز سلوک العمل الاستباقى من خلال الدور الوسيط للتمکين النفسي. مجلة الغريى للعلوم الاقتصادية والإدارية, 15(4), 156-197
• العماوى بشرى فاروق, مرزوق عبد العزيز على, والسنديونى منى محمد.(2019). أثر الاستقامة التنظيمية في الاستغراق الوظيفي, دراسة تطبيقية على هيئة التمريض بالمستشفيات الحکومية بمحافظة کفر الشيخ . مجلة الدراسات التجارية المعاصرة: کلية التجارة- جامعة کفر الشيخ, (6), 185-122.
• عطية, غادة عادل .(2019). أثر الدعم التنظيمي المدرک على سلوکيات الانسحاب: الدور الوسيط للتوحد التنظيمي في ظل توافر الثقة التنظيمية بالتطبيق على قطاع النسيج والملابس الجاهزة في الإسکندرية, ج م ع. المجلة العلمية للاقتصاد والتجارة :کلية التجارة – جامعة الإسکندرية. 49(7). 385- 450.
• ريان، عادل ريان محمد.(2013). بحوث التسويق: المبادئ والقياس والطرق، مطبعة هابي رايت، أسيوط.
• شاکر ليث. (2019).اختبار العلاقة بين سلوک القيادة الجمالي والاستقامة التنظيمية دراسة تطبيقية في العتبة العلوية المقدسة. مجلة کلية التربية للبنات للعلوم الإنسانية,2(25), 145-167.
• §         يسرى, هبة حمد.(2018). الهوية التنظيمية والتوحد التنظيمي في مدارس بورسعيد الدولية. رسالة ماجستير غير منشورة – جامعة قناة السويس.

ثانياً- المراجع الأجنبية:

• Aboobaker, N., Edward, M. and K.A.,Z. (2019). Workplace spirituality, employee wellbeing and intention to stay: A multi-group analysis of teachers’ career choice International Journal of Educational Management,33 (1), 8-44.
• Ashforth, B. &Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of management review,14(1), 20-39.
• Balliett, T. &Kelloway, E. (2011). Virtuous leaders: Assessing character strengths in the workplace. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28, 270–283.
• Barclay, L. & Markel, K. (2012). Virtue theory and organizations: considering persons with disabilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(4), 330 - 346.
• Baron, R. & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
• Bateman, T. S., &Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
• Bohlmann, C., &Zacher, H. (2020). Making Things Happen (Un)Expectedly: Interactive Effects of Age, Gender, and Motives on Evaluations of Proactive Behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1-23.
• Brian J., Benjamin M. &Rustin D. (2019). Situational Strength as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Organizational Identification and Work Outcomes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(1), 87– 97.
• Cameron, K. &Lavine, M. (2006). Making the impossible possible. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
• Cameron‚ K.S.‚ Bright‚ D‚ Caza‚ A. (2004). Exploring the relationships between organizational virtuousness and performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 766-790.
• Çeri-Booms, M. (2012). How Can Authentic Leaders Create Organizational? ANE Empirical Study on Turkish Employee. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 7(2), 172 -190.
• Chen, S., Jiang, W., Zhang, G., & Chu, F. (2019). Spiritual leadership on proactive workplace behavior: The role of organizational identification and psychological safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1206.
• https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01206
• Cheney, G. (1982). Organizational identification as process and product: A field study Unpublished master's thesis, PurdueUniversity.
• Crant, J.M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of management, 26(3), 435-462.
• DeConinckJ. (2011).The effects of ethical climate on organizational identification, supervisory trust, and turnover among salespeople. Journal of Business Research, (64),617-24.
• Etebarian, K., & Changizi, M. (2017). The relation of organizational commitment, perceiving organizational virtuousness and procrastinating issues with respect to the role of demographic variables. State management periodical, 7(21), 11-25.
• Etodike, C., Ifeanacho, N., Iloke, S &Anierobi, E. (2020). Organizational Identification and Proactive Work Behaviour as Predictors of Cyber-loafing among Anambra State Civil Servants. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports. 10-19. 10.9734/ajarr/2020/v8i230194.
• Fayyazi, M. Simar - asl, N. & Kaveh. M. (2010). Positive psychology in leadership and management of the organization. National Conference leadership and management challenges in Iranian organizations, Iran, Isfahan, Azad University Research. in Persia>
• Gotsis, G., & Grimani, K. (2016). The role of servant leadership in fostering inclusive organizations. Journal of Management Development, 35(8), 985–1010.
• Grant, A.M., & Ashford, S.J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, (28), 3–34.
• Hu, D., Zhang, B. & Wang, M. (2015). A Study on the Relationship among Transformational Leadership, Organizational Identification and Voice Behavior. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8, 142-148.
• Hur, W., Shin, Y., Rhee, S & Kim, H. (2017). Organizational virtuousness perceptions and task crafting: The mediating roles of organizational identification and work engagement. Career Development International, 22(4), 436-459.
• Hyderabadi, A. (2010),Social trust and social-cultural factors affecting it (Case study 20 to 29 years old, the Mazandaran province). Journal of Sociology Youth Studies, 1, 39-66.
• Islam, T., Ahmed, I.& Ali, G. (2018). Effects of ethical leadership on bullying and voice behavior among nurses: Mediating role of organizational identification, poor working condition and workload. Leadership in Health Services, 32, 10.1108/LHS-02-2017-0006.
• Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73 (3), 287–302.
• Karanika-Murray, M., Duncan, N., Pontes, H. M. & Griffiths, M. D. (2015),Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30 ( 8), 1019-1033.
• Kaviyani, E & Ahmadi, S.(2019). To Investigate the Relation between Organizational Virtuousness and Organizational Commitment with Mediatory Role of Ethical Leadership. International journal of Business Management, 4 (1), 86-94
• Kim, B. (2019). Unstable Jobs Cannot Cultivate Good Organizational Citizens: The Sequential Mediating Role of Organizational Trust and Identification. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16. 1102. 10.3390/ijerph16071102.
• Klimchak, M., Carsten, M., Morrell, D &. MacKenzie, W.(2016). Employee Entitlement and Proactive Work Behaviors: The Moderating Effects of Narcissism and Organizational Identification. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,(6),1-10
• Kooshki, S & Zeinabadi, H.(2016). Organizational Virtuousness in Schools: A Review of Factor Structure of a Tool in Secondary Schools. Journal of Administrative Management, Education and Training,12 (2), 60-69.
• Magill, R.G., &Prybil, L. (2001). Guidelines for organizational Ethics: The goal should be virtuous organizations with a Community Covenant. Health Progress, (July-August 2001), 12-14.
• Manz, C.C., Cameron, K.S., Manz, K.P., Marx, R.D., & Neal, J. (2008). The Virtuous Organization: Insights from Some of the World Leading Management Thinkers. World Scientific Publishing Company.
• Malik, Z &Naeem, R.(2016). Organizational Virtuousness, Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Mediation Framework. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 26(1), 113-129
• Mello, J. (2011). Strategic human resource management(3rd ed.). Mason, OH: South-western Cengage Learning.
• Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering the organizational identification questionnaire. Management communication quarterly, 13(4), 626-658.
• Miao, Q., Eva, N & Newman, A & Schwarz, G. (2019). Public service motivation and performance: The role of organizational identification. Public Money & Management, 39(2), 77-85.
• Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C.C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extra-role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (4), 403–419.
• Newman, A., Round, H., Bhattacharya, S. & Roy, A. (2017). Ethical climates in organizations: a review and research agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27, 475–512. doi: 10.1017/beq.2017.23
•  Ng, T & Feldman, D.(2013).Changes in Perceived Supervisor Embedded ness: Effects on Employees’ Embedded ness, Organizational Trust, and Voice BehaviorpersonnelPsychology,66,645- 685.
• Nguyen, T., Pham, T., Le, Q., Pham, T., Bui, T & Nguyen, T. (2020). Impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment through organizational trust and organizational identification. Management Science Letters , 10(14), 3453-3462.
• Nikandrou, I., &Tsachouridi, I. (2015). Towards a better understanding of the “buffering effects” of organizational virtuousness’ perceptions on employee outcomes. Management Decision, 53(8), 1823–1842.
• Nurjaman, K., Marta, M., Eliyana, A., Kurniasari, D. & Kurniasari, D. (2019). Proactive work behavior and innovative work behavior: Moderating effect of job characteristics. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), 373-379.
• Pagliaro, S.& Lo Presti, A. & Barattucci, M., Giannella, V & Barreto, M. (2018). On the Effects of Ethical Climate(s) on Employees’ Behavior: A Social Identity Approach. Frontiers in Psychology. 9.960.10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00960.
• Parker, S.K., &Bindl, U. K. (2017). Proactivity at work: Making things happen in organizations. New York: Routledge.
• Parker, S.K., & Collins, C.G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662.
• Parker, S. ., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652.
• Ravaji, M,.(2016). The Effect of Organizational Virtuousness and Psychological Capital Role on Employees' Creativity In Tehran Water and Wastewater Company, International Journal of Scientific Management and Development, 4(12), 496-506.
• Rego, A. &Ribeiro, N. (2009). Does Perceived Organizational Virtuousness Explain Organizational Citizenship Behaviors?. International Conference on Business, Economics, Management and Marketing on Jun 26, 2009, Paris, France.
• Rego, Arménio & Ribeiro, Neuza & Cunha, Miguel &Jesuino, Jorge. (2011). How happiness mediates the organizational virtuousness and affective commitment relationship. Journal of Business Research. 524-532. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.04.009.
• Seckinger, J., Langerak, B., Mishra, J. & Mishra, B. (2010). Optimism and Longevity. Advances in Management, 3(3), 32 – 39.
• Sekaran, U. &Bougie, R. (2013). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. 6^th Edition, Wiley, New York.
• Singh, S., David, R. &Mikkilineni, S. (2018). Organizational Virtuousness and Work Engagement: Mediating Role of Happiness in India. Advances in Developing Human Resources,20(1), 88–102.
• Sya, I & Etikariena, A. (2019). A Virtuous Company Makes Me Engage! The Mediation Role of Organizational Identification in the Workplace. Conference: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Intervention and Applied Psychology. 10.2991/iciap.
• Teng, C. & Lu, A. & Huang, Z & Fang, C. (2019). Ethical work climate, organizational identification, leader-member-exchange (LMX) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). A study of three star hotels in Taiwan. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. ahead-of-print. 10.1108/IJCHM-07-2018-0563.
• Tian,Q., Hu,Y & Cheng, K.(2018). Servant Leadership and Voice Behavior: Organizational Identification as a Mediator, International Conference on Information Technology and Management Engineering .
• Van Dyne, L., &LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (1), 108–119.
• Venkataramani, V. &Tangirala, S. (2010). When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95: 582-591.
• Wu, C.H. and Parker, S.K. (2017). T-he role of leader support in facilitating proactive work behavior: A perspective from attachment theory. Journal of Management, 43(4), 1025-1049.
• Yan, L, Shuming, Z., Rui, L. Lulu, Z & Feng, T. (2016). The relationship between organizational identification and internal whistle-blowing: the joint moderating effects of perceived ethical climate and proactive personality. Review of Managerial Science. 12. 10.1007/s11846-016-0214-z.
• Zhu, W., He, H., Treviño, K., Chao. M., & Wang, W. (2015). Ethical leadership and follower voice and performance: The role of follower identifications and entity morality beliefs. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 702–718.
• Zhu, W., Sosik, J., Riggio, R. & Yang, B. (2012). Relationships between trans-formational and active transactional leadership and followers' organizational identification: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 13(3), 186- 212.
• Ziapour, A; Bistoni, S. and Afsari, D. (2015). The Relationship between Organizational Virtuousness and Employee Engagement. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 9(8), 1442-1447.